Click here for instant Brookline Real Estate Blog Updates!

 Subscribe in a reader Share on Facebook

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in Bloglines Add to Technorati Favorites

Welcome

Welcome to your constantly updated resource for news and views on the Brookline Real Estate market. Here you will find commentary and statistics to explain the daily changes in the Brookline specific housing market.

Whether you're looking for an estate in Cottage Farm, a condo in Brookline Village or are just stopping by please feel free to read along and comment at will. If you are interested in speaking about renting an apartment, buyer representation or listing your home please feel free to contact me.

Showing posts with label Predatory Lending. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Predatory Lending. Show all posts

Monday, April 14, 2008

0

AP poll: More avoid buying homes.

AP poll: More avoid buying homes - Boston.com

In the article from the link above we are seeing that the general public is responding to the media stories about the "downturn." We all know that the most basic economic principle is supply and demand. So, how does this consumer sentiment apply to the Brookline housing market?

We need to first look at one of the major elements of the "boom" of the past 3-5 years. While we know single family home sales have always remained strong and will continue to drive the Brookline housing market to newer heights, condominiums are the "bread and butter" of our market. Most Brookline residents cannot afford to live in the "average" $1.3 million dollar home. It is why we see almost ten times more condos sold in Brookline each year. So, the real estate "volume" is tied up in the condo market here in Brookline. One thing that has changed since 2003 is many multi family homes that used to be rental apartments were purchased by budding "developers" who converted the apartments into condominiums. To be clear, an apartment is a unit in a building but a condo is a deeded living space within an association. So, for the five years that saw incredible growth in the housing market, these apartments started disappearing from the marketplace. Then, in 2004 three very large buildings that traditionally were rental apartment buildings converted to condominiums. First was the conversion of both 1450-1454 Beacon Street (The Warwick) and that was soon followed by 1600 Beacon Street (Washington on the Square). Later in 2004 20 Chapel Street (Longwood Towers) was also converted, removing in total more than 1000 rental apartments from the Brookline market. This sent rental supply plummeting and left renters with little choice but to use a very easy path to mortgages to buy these units as condos.

These events caused rents to increase (supply and demand) and actually most likely contributed to 2006 having a slightly weaker pricing in condo sales. Then, as we moved into the "bubble" talk of mid-2007 we saw many potential buyers start to investigate renting again. As the AP story indicates, many people see this as the "better" path in this market. The problem in Brookline is the rental inventory is still pretty dry. We cannot build any more rental apartments, so where are these renters going to go? All of a sudden the mortgage market isn't allowing the traditional "first time home buyer" to obtain financing as they could two years ago and now rents for a 2 bed apartment are hovering around $2000 a month (in many cases without parking). Enter what looks to be a brilliant stroke by big developers in The Fenway. These new buildings (Trilogy, etc...) might be where all of these people who bought the sub-$400,000 condos in Brookline in the past are going to move to.

This is something worth watching because as a result of the lending environment of the past these traditionally more "transient" homeowners will have less equity in their homes (if any) and will need to sell in the next year or two. Suddenly these homeowners might find themselves being landlords because they cannot afford to sell. The good news for them is if they can manage holding their property and renting it out, there still should be strong rental demand, but these new mega-buildings along Boylston St near Fenway Park will soften that market a little (all shiny and new). As I've been saying all along, the "core" of the Brookline homeowners should weather this market adjustment just fine. Those with 20%+ equity and strong buying power will not notice much of a change. It is this sub-$400,000 market that will most mirror what we're hearing from the rest of the country.

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

0

Presidential Candidates Thoughts on Housing Market

McCain offers tough love on housing woes - Boston.com

In this Boston.com article (link above) Republican Nominee Sen. John McCain speaks to the responsibility lenders and borrowers have when participating in the housing market. Many times housing industry insiders talk about the benefits of home ownership and lenders advertise the wonderful "opportunities" out there for consumers. Nobody seems to want to stand up and remind people that any time you borrow hundreds of thousands of dollars there is a promise that you will pay back not only every penny of that borrowed amount but also every penny of the interest needed to borrow that sum of money.

I have to say that it seems like all sides of this discussion seem to follow "traditional party lines." The one possible exception is Sen. McCain seems to be taking a pretty strong conservative line in this article. It will interesting to see how far we have to let things "self-correct." The President and many Republicans are subscribing to the belief that the free market will continue to balance itself and any interference will only put us in danger of increased damage. The Democrats and both candidates for the nomination advocate for immediate government intervention to help stabilize the housing and mortgage markets.

One thing we've seen this week is J.P. Morgan Chase's quick move to rescue Bear Stearns is a prime example of the free marketplace moving into self-correction mode. It is in the best interest of all parties for both of these firms to remain as strong as possible. Similar efforts between Bank of America and Countrywide seemed to shore up Countrywide's position as a major future player in the marketplace. Again, both examples are extreme cases of marketplace self-correction and we hope that no major financial institutions get to this point ever again. That being said, the marketplace is showing a willingness to support itself and maybe allowing it to go, with government supervision and observation, is the way to go? Thoughts?

Thursday, October 11, 2007

0

Hey Hey, Ho Ho, Countrywide Has Got to Go???

I was just enjoying a peaceful rainy day lunch at my favorite Coolidge Corner lunch stop when I heard the above chant coming through the windows. It seems like a group called the "Massachusetts Alliance to Stop Predatory lenders" and the "Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America (NACA)" have banded together to protest at all of Boston's Countrywide offices. Never one to pass up an opportunity I asked a nice gentleman handing out fliers to explain to me why we were trying to stop Countrywide. Let's just say he wasn't quite sure why. My conversation with the non-home-owning NACA representative actually centered around the fact that Countrywide is not a financial adviser or an attorney contracted to protect your rights.

Every single one of my customers and clients knows that when we have discussions about homes they want to look at, lenders they want to pick to finance those homes, and legal counsel they want to represent them at the closing (as opposed to Banks' counsel) we make sure that everything starts with one question. "How much are you comfortable spending each month?" Where in this crazy market did we lose personal accountability? I actually ask my buyer clients to fill out an extensive questionnaire before we proceed too far into the home search process to make sure that they're not following a harmful path.

One of the fears we have in the real estate brokerage business is how easy it is to get a license to sell Real Estate. There is no practical training to steer you through the potential pitfalls. Nobody trains you on consumer protection. In fact, all you have to know to get a license in MA is what method of mapping is used by communities and what parties you can't discriminate against. Buyers, in their quest to go to the path of least resistance will not hire a buyer's agent to protect them. Around and round we go until we end up at the closing table without representation and all of a sudden a buyer has been "mislead" or "misinformed" about their purchase.

I'm sure we'll hear more "big" news from the lending industry in the not-too-distant future, but when we boil it down to facts, homeowners must understand that in purchasing a house they are putting themselves into significant debt. If managed properly their purchase has a tremendous potential for upside, but improperly used it can destroy their financial well-being.

top 10% awardAwarded Top 10% in the Nation for Consumer Satisfaction by the Internet Consumer Group
more info

Subscribe via email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Disclaimer

The views expressed on these pages are the opinion of the author and any public contributors. They do not substitute for the advice of a legal or financial professional. These opinions are not representative of any firm or business. Please always consult an attorney, financial professional or sign a contract with a Buyer Agent or Seller's Agent for specific advice.